The Ubiquity

The New NAFTA isn’t New

Back to Article
Back to Article

The New NAFTA isn’t New

Picture by Pranesh Kumar

Picture by Pranesh Kumar

Picture by Pranesh Kumar

By Pranesh Kumar, Staff Writer

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






On Monday, October 3, President Trump spoke at the White House’s Rose Garden and announced the end of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The replacement of the pact was long overdue, especially given how much Trump criticized NAFTA in the past. At the press conference, the president claimed that the treaty had led to enormous trade deficits and the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs. He promised to renegotiate the deal, and a new deal has finally been passed after months of negotiating with Canada. The treaty is now called the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and has been described by Trump as revolutionary. However, this is hardly the case given the minor changes that have been made to the original agreement.

The USMCA is nowhere near the radical makeover of NAFTA that Trump had promised. It maintains NAFTA’s continental free-trade zone and has kept most of its provisions, while only offering some increased benefits to American workers. For instance, the deal requires that 70 percent of a car’s components be made in Canada, the U.S., or Mexico (instead of 62.5 percent). Workers making more than $16.00 per hour must now contribute to at least 40 percent of the labor going into the manufacturing of the car (instead of 30 percent). Additionally, there are stricter labor requirements on Mexico and tariffs have been reduced on some Canadian dairy products.

The business community of the U.S. has happily welcomed the deal because of how the changes will somewhat affect foreign manufacturing. Labor unions aren’t sure how to react, though their reactions will most likely be subdued. Furthermore, the reaction from congressional Democrats was also very minor. Some congressmen have mildly applauded the deal, while others have declined to take a stance on it. These reactions have given the impression that the deal is unanimously accepted by all parties. However, given the media’s mild reaction to this deal as well, it only goes to show how little the USMCA has changed NAFTA.

Trump suggested that the new agreement is likely to trigger a surge in U.S. manufacturing. However, the changes are so marginal that they are likely not going to affect the economy severely. The USMCA will not drastically affect trading between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico either. Basically, the USMCA is a revamped version of NAFTA with some polishing and new branding.

Ever since becoming president, Trump has been known for not being as radical as he had previously claimed he would be. His new NAFTA is no exception to this. It is an ideal agreement for all parties, but definitely not revolutionary.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Pranesh Kumar, Staff Writer

Hello, Rebels! My name is Pranesh Kumar, and I’m really looking forward to being a writer for the QHHS Ubiquity! I am in the shadow of a long list of...

Navigate Left
  • The New NAFTA isn’t New

    Opinion

    Do Students Study Only to Get Good Grades?

  • The New NAFTA isn’t New

    Opinion

    What Makes a Great Teacher?

  • The New NAFTA isn’t New

    Opinion

    Does Homework Really help Students Learn?

  • Opinion

    Everyone Has the Right To Live

  • The New NAFTA isn’t New

    Opinion

    Is Taking College Classes Worth It for High Schoolers?

  • The New NAFTA isn’t New

    Opinion

    Some People Are Too Old to Vote

  • Opinion

    Should We Be Scared?

  • The New NAFTA isn’t New

    Opinion

    Do High Schools Really Prepare Students for the Future?

  • The New NAFTA isn’t New

    Opinion

    Erasing History in the AP World

  • The New NAFTA isn’t New

    Opinion

    Black Cats Aren’t Bad Luck

Navigate Right
The student news site of Quartz Hill High School
The New NAFTA isn’t New